Comments on: Masaliev Submits the Issue of AUCA’s Location for Consideration

By: Kyrgyzka

Kyrgyzka — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:49:39 +0000

dear Communist, i just saw this article and even if it is late, i couldn’t stop myself from answering back to you. because it seems like you don’t know some stuff. ok,
at first, before writing any comments like this i would highly recommend you to check your grammar, because AUCA is not rEAch university! (i guess you meant rIch…)
at second, where would you know that AUCA students are brainwashed??? do you know that by saying “Those students from AUCA are brainwashed” you are mentioning nearly 1500 students, are you sure about that?
Also, i do agree with Idocare’s opinion, AUCA is not just staying in this building, but also improving it’s conditions. I wanna ask you have you ever been in the KRSU’s, or KNU’s bathroom? But have you been in AUCA’s?? if not, then go, check and compare!
Even if you are communist, that doesn’t mean you HAVE to agree with Masaliev.
Also, if you really think that kids from rich families study therem, then so WHAT?They are there but still they are studying! They are not bribing, or doing that stuff! Well, look at those rich kids from KRSU who haven’t even seen some of their professor (because of course they never go to the University) and compare them to those kids from AUCA who even if they are rich, they still go to the university and have to study, because they can’t bribe!
So, let’s be more objective on these kinda issues.
Thank you.

By: munira

munira — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:25:33 +0000

student

By: munira

munira — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:24:58 +0000

I want to study at AUCA

By: Idocare

Idocare — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 07:24:46 +0000

“AUCA’s building has a historical value, because it used to belong to the Kyrgyz Government” – Well it still has a historical value and the university does its best to maintain the building in best condition possible. It doesn’t only take care of the building, but also improves its infrastructure and renovates it.

It also has close ties with our history and I don’t see the point of giving it to private hands” – Private hands have always been seen as something evil, wrong, etc. It should be noted that these private hands have done a lot in improving the conditions of the building. It’s just enough to have a look at state universities to see what they do with state buildings and what conditions they have in them. I also wonder, by taking the building from “private hands”, what would he do with it, who else would he give it to? Does the governmnt all over sadden happen to lack some space?

“…and He also mentioned that the vast majority of AUCA’s students are the government officials’ kids and few of them are from the regions” – As mentioned above, the guy needs to meet our students and if necessary be provided with information about the students and given financial aid.

I guess, when people up there get bored and want some excitement, they seek any opportunity of sensation and/or argument. Why does he need the building?? What does he want to do with it, I wonder…

By: aika

aika — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:40:44 +0000

Hello EVERYone! I think this question should not be taken into consideration because if the govenment takes our building then what is going to happen to the unversity? This university has became a “historical” place which has produced so many professionals. I think if the government takes our building than it should propose some other building.

By: Communist

Communist — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:26:46 +0000

I do support Mr. Masaliev. Those students from AUCA are brainwashed. He is absolutely right in sense that AUCA should leave the historical building in the center of Bishkek. AUCA should better build its own building, since it is a reach university….

By: Almaz

Almaz — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:17:21 +0000

to those who don’t know:

93% of AUCA students get the job after the graduation…

International students come from more than 20 countries of the world…

AUCA pays 30 mln to the country’s budget…

By: Peteranswers

Peteranswers — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:26:20 +0000

i reckon that this is very delicate issue, however masaliev announcment doesn’t have perspective and seems to be unreal.

By: adik

adik — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:09:00 +0000

i think Masaliev should NOT take auca’s building before auca creates the new one.

By: Altynai

Altynai — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:45:52 +0000

I study at AUCA and I can not say that all students from Kyrgyzstan are children of deputies or rich entrepreneurs. For instance, I represent the middle class and have a financial aid, so I have an opportunity to study in such a wonderful univerisity like AUCA! But I don’t understand what actually wants Mr. Massaliev and whom interests he represents. First, he confirms that the university has to pay the facility and that AUCA has to give the opportunity for students from Kyrgyzstan to study for free of charge but after all he says that even if AUCA will comply with above mentioned demands he won’t stop and will make AUCA to move from “historical building”. If it is only about the building, why he touches the theme of scholarships and facility?